Blogs by Empire contributing editor Damon Wise (@yo_damo)
Pages
▼
Friday, 31 October 2014
Nightcrawler: an interview with Jake Gyllenhaal and Dan Gilroy
The media doesn’t get a great press in the movies: Kirk
Douglas’s Chuck Tatum in Ace In The Hole, Burt Lancaster’s JJ Hunsecker in The
Sweet Smell Of Success or Faye Dunaway’s Diana Christensen in Network. Adding
to this long and nefarious roll call of rogues we now have Jake Gyllenhaal’s
Lou Bloom, the focus of Dan Gilroy’s superb city-set thriller Nightcrawler.
Sporting greasy locks, a skinny frame and piercing killer eyes, Bloom is a
cold, calculating chancer who stumbles on the world of independent
news-gathering, invests in a HandiCam and starts chasing the emergency services
around LA to cover all the mayhem and murder that happens there after dark.
He’s not there to help. Or as Bloom puts it himself, “If you see me, you're
having the worst day of your life.” Directed by Dan Gilroy, brother of the Bourne series’ Tony,
Nightcrawler is fantastic celebration of the antihero that takes potshots at
today’s media without ever preaching or patronising. And as its centre is a
towering performance by Gyllenhaal, playing a man who not only knows what he
wants – he’s ready and ruthless enough to take it. Says Gilroy, “The true
starting point for this story was that I was really interested in a crime
photographer from the 40s in New York, a guy called Weegee. Really interesting
guy; he was the first guy to put a police scanner in his car and drive around looking
for crime scenes. I was fascinated by the intersection of art and crime, but I
couldn't think of a way to do the story, so I put it aside. Then I moved to Los
Angeles a number of years ago, and I heard about these people who I guess would
be considered the modern equivalent of Weegee. It was just a much more kinetic,
cinematic concept – people driving round at 100mph with a dozen police scanners
going. At the same time I was coming up with the character of Lou Bloom over
time, and plugging him into that story. It was like an atom coming together –
it suddenly made sense.”
Gyllenhaal – who, when we meet at the Toronto Film Festival,
has clearly regained the 20lb he shed for the part – bats away suggestions that
Bloom is simply a psychopath. “To me,” he says, “what was more interesting was
thinking about the character as an artist. Someone who is trying to find his
way, and who finds it in the seediest but most random way. Fate hands him an
opportunity and he just starts to go with it. It's the birth of an artist, in
my opinion, the birth of a cinematographer. Initially I read a number of books
about sociopathy and then afterwards I dropped it. Dan and I never talked about
anything like that again. It wasn't the right way to go. You can't walk into a scene
wondering, 'How evil is this person? How morally abhorrent is this person.' I
had to think about the beautiful interactions that Lou would have with these
very desperate people, and how much fun it would be for him to use them, to get
to where he wants to go.” Key to Bloom’s power is the look that the actor came up with
for him, his hollow cheeks perfectly accentuating that baleful, 100-watt stare.
“The idea was that he would be thin and that he would feel hungry,” says the
actor. “Dan and I, when we first met, we discussed that. We were talking about
Los Angeles, and having grown up there I know that there's this other world
that's going on all the time, in the wilderness. Unlike a lot of major
metropolises it's surrounded by desert, and there are those wild animals –
particularly coyotes – that are lurking around in the shadows. And occasionally
you see them, walking down the street, and you think, 'What the fuck is this
coyote doing here?' Dan and I talked about that, and I certain point I said,
'Lou is a coyote,' and Dan was like, 'Yessss!' I mean, when you see one of
these coyotes they're skinny and they just stare at you like they're going to
eat you. Their techniques are all about preying on the desperate.” As he did on End Of Watch, Gyllenhaal took his research out
on the streets. “We did go out with a couple of guys that do this kind of work
in Los Angeles,” he says. “We spent a number of nights going around the city,
going to crime scenes and accident scenes, sitting round in empty parking lots
for hours and hours listening to police radio, hearing something and then going
chasing after it. Watching them filming it, editing it, selling it. It was
hugely helpful. I mean, these guys get to know the police department, the fire
department, who to talk to and how to deal with them, so I really got to know
the ins and outs of it.” Although Gyllenhaal is the focus of the film’s advance buzz,
credit should also be given to Gilroy for a screenplay that never sugar-coats
or moralises about its subject. “I approached it as a success story,” he says. “The
story starts with a guy who's looking for work at the beginning of the film and
has a successful business by the end. You're watching the creation of a
success. Now, he's also a monster, but you're watching as this thing gets created.”
For Gyllenhaal, Lou Bloom’s appetite was not a stretch to
find. “Lou's idea of success is something I can empathise with,” he muses. “The
idea of money, or fame, or that unknown thing that you feel compelled to go
after. I think that's true of my generation, the world I grew up in, in
America, in capitalism – it's inherent in all these things. It's in your
psyche. It's cultural. And when I was younger, all those things were very
important to me. But I would say that, now, my idea of success is incredibly
different from Lou's. That has shifted for me, which has allowed to me comment
on those things. But I love the idea that if you don't have empathy, you can
take all society's ideals and do the things that Lou does. And there are people
that do do that. Our world is a very dangerous place. I'm not a cynic – I
don't think it's not beautiful, but the more I spend time meeting people who do
real, tough jobs – that's definitely how I feel.” • A version of this article featured in a past issue of Empire magazine…
No comments:
Post a Comment